Corrections log and policy
Local Record is derived from public records. When the site gets something wrong, the correction should be visible, specific, and traceable to the source.
Meeting summaries on this site are AI-assisted and can contain errors, especially in proper nouns, vote tallies, dollar figures, addresses, and transcript-derived wording. Every meeting page links to its primary source. The official document, recording, agenda packet, or transcript remains the authoritative record.
How to report a correction
Send correction requests to corrections@localrecord.org or use the feedback form and choose Correction. If the issue appears on a meeting page, include the meeting URL and the exact sentence, phrase, number, name, or link that appears wrong.
What to include
-
PageThe Local Record URL where the issue appears.
-
Specific claimThe exact text, vote tally, date, dollar figure, name, address, source link, or summary point that should be reviewed.
-
Source supportA link, page number, agenda item, timestamp, transcript interval, or public-record citation that supports the correction.
-
ContactAn email address if you want a reply. Anonymous reports are reviewed, but follow-up may not be possible.
How corrections are reviewed
Correction requests are checked against the linked official source first. If the linked source is incomplete or ambiguous, Local Record may check another public record from the same public body, such as a later approved-minutes packet, meeting recording, agenda attachment, or public portal entry. Unsupported assertions are not substituted for source-backed facts.
When a correction is confirmed, the affected page is updated and the change is logged below. If the issue is material, the page should include a visible correction note near the corrected passage or source-verification area. Minor typographical fixes may be made without a separate log entry when they do not change meaning.
What gets corrected
-
Factual errorsWrong names, dates, vote tallies, dollar figures, addresses, ordinance numbers, parcel references, motion outcomes, source links, or meeting metadata.
-
Unsupported summary languageA statement that overstates, understates, or adds meaning not supported by the cited source.
-
Missing uncertaintyCases where the source is unclear and the page should say so instead of presenting the claim as settled.
-
Broken trust metadataBroken source links, missing source labels, incorrect source-status language, or incorrect AI disclosure.
What does not count as a correction
-
DisagreementA policy disagreement, objection to a public body's decision, or preferred interpretation that is not a factual error in the summary.
-
OmissionA request to add context that is not necessary to correct an inaccurate or misleading published claim.
-
Private informationNon-public material, private correspondence, or background claims that cannot be checked against public source material.
-
Official source changesIf a public body later changes, replaces, or corrects its own record, Local Record may update the derived summary, but the issuing body remains responsible for the official record.
Visible updates
Confirmed material corrections should identify what changed, when it changed, and which source supports the change. The goal is not to erase errors silently; it is to make the corrected version useful while preserving a public trail for meaningful corrections.
Published corrections log
-
May 27, 2026
Correction / Content CorrectionRemoved unsupported Fort Mill Town Council legacy listing card
Removed an unsupported legacy listing card for the December 15, 2025 Fort Mill Town Council meeting from aggregate and search surfaces. The facts-first meeting page was already correct and remains published with provenance and claim-check details.Affected records:Notes:- The issue came from tools/meetings.json, not the canonical facts artifact.
- The incorrect legacy card included Mayor Helms attribution and unsupported 6-1 / Steele Street claims.
1 record -
May 27, 2026
Source Recovery / Source CorrectionRecovered correct Fort Mill Planning Commission source
Published the real Fort Mill Planning Commission December 16, 2025 record from source _12162025-550 after identifying that a separate same-date source, _12162025-552, belonged to the Fort Mill Public Facilities Corporation and was not published as Planning Commission.Affected records:Notes:- The PFC artifact remains held and was not published as Planning Commission.
1 record -
May 27, 2026
Review Warning Publication / Review WarningPublished bounded needs-review records with visible warnings
Published eight records with visible Needs review banners while preserving machine claim-check issues and source/provenance details.Affected records:- York County Council March 16, 2026
- York County Council January 20, 2026
- York County Planning Commission October 13, 2025
- York County Planning Commission August 11, 2025
- Fort Mill Council October 27, 2025
- Fort Mill Council September 22, 2025
- York County Council September 2, 2025
- York County Council December 1, 2025
Notes:- These records were not silently cleared and remain machine needs_review.
8 records